Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
We are a venture capital fund focused on enabling founders of technology-enabled companies. At the early stages of a company's creation the founders' equity is priced low, thus, offering equity creates the largest loss e.g. dilution. As such, we believe it is in the founders' best interest to raise as little capital as possible, maintain a culture of stinginess, and build as far as possible toward Product-Market Fit. Once done, a startup's valuation spikes and attracting capital based on existing traction becomes immeasurably easier from existing venture capitalists. We have great respect for the founders who have consciously decided to forgo profitability, reaise equity from venture capitalists and grow their topline (or other metric) as rapidly as possible). This "blitzscaling" model tendsto work best in winner-take-all, land-grab type industry verticals. It is not a fit for all, or even most, startups playing in competitive spaces that differentiate from peers based on intellectual property, regional variations, demonstrably defensible and repeatable customer relationships.
We are a defiant group of investors, having reached the highs and lows, we appreciate the determination and the courage it takes to start a company, especially when 8 of 10 startups (including retail) fail to survive past three years. We want to work with any and all founders, but particularly respect and feel a kinship to those founders that have had the grit and perseverance to rise from more humble or overlooked backgrounds, like ourselves. We will evaluate all startups founders and teams equally, but believe there is a character element that is revealed through adversity and we tend to look for that similar character trait in all of our founders. As such, we want to work with founders from all over the US, not just the tech hubs. Increasingly, we have come to believe that diversity in gender, race, thought, upbringing, and experience hones skills that can not be taught. Thus, we prioritize the underdog, regardless of the background, as the crucible of the merit-first competitive market rewards truly great leaders and companies equally. We keep this at the top of our investment selection process. We want to invest in founders from all education and national backgrounds, not just those from the Ivy League or well known educational or geographic areas.
We are impact investors and seek to have a demonstrable and defined impact in society, namely, being a force of elevating startups that preserve and protect democracies or win the competition between adversarial states that do not share a respect for such principles, values, and accountability. This means that while we have discretion in what we invest, we have a fiduciary obligation to prioritize returns beyond financial results thereby improving the world in a more fullsome way with a broader aperture beyond mere financial results. That said, we expect that our strategy will naturally produce progress on a number of Impact KPIs. Having previously set standards for, and invested in, ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) priorities and still seeking opportunities to achieve a more lasting legacy. That will never dissipate and doing good never is not a stylistic fad or fleeting and temporary endeavor. As such, we will look for opportunities to make a difference without sacrificing returns but also ensuring the greatest good in democratic leadership and societies.
We measure our success and progress through both traditional and impact KPIs.
Traditional KPIs are:
Our impact KPIs are:
Our investment process:
We respond to your initial approach within 2 weeks of applying.
Most companies receive a quick no, which we think is better than a slow maybe. If we think that we’re a fit, our typical next steps are:
We have also invested significant resources into our internal proprietary sourcing and deal flow technology and comparison tracking. This gives us a distinction in our proprietary data and process flows, that are unique and we believe a source of differentiation.
We believe that these differentiators will become more obvious overtime and will be evinced in our track record and returns, as well as broader impact:
The most important factor in our decision-making is always the founding team.
The most common questions for us?
How much do you typically invest? $200K-1M
Is there an ownership requiement: We do not. In addition, we don’t prioritize growing our stake over time. Rather, our goal is to maximize the value of our investment, which often means raising further capital sparingly and reducing dilution to the founding team.
What rounds do you prefer to invest? We invest in rounds of between $200,000 and typically $2m, for our initial investment into a company.
Will you only invest as a lead investor?
Definitely not. We have a long track record of partnering with other investors. We will coinvest with other VCs leading a round if we are excited about the opportunity.
We are also glad to include other VCs/angels in rounds that we lead.
Note we strongly believe that it’s in your best interest to have an active, credible, and experienced lead investor.
Do you demand a board seat?
A board seat is not required, only where we think we can be helpful, and there is a mutual interest.
Regardless of whether we take a board seat, our goal is to be your most value-added investor during the two years after we invest. In lieu of or in addition to board meetings, we organize “working sessions.” In these sessions, we go deep with you on a major challenge. We’ve found this type of collaboration very valuable.
Minimum investment requirements:
Since we do not require a personal guarantee, our focus is the business’s sustainability and growth plan, not on your credit score or past credit history.
Copyright © 2021 Nat'l Security Ventures - All Rights Reserved.